Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Counterfactual Likelihood Tests for Indirect Influence in Private Reasoning Channels

Reasoning systems increasingly separate intermediate computation into private and public channels, creating evaluation cases that look similar in transcripts: independent co-derivation, direct access to private content, and indirect influence through public communication. This paper presents a counterfactual likelihood test for measuring influence between private reasoning channels. The method replaces an upstream private block with a length-matched donor block, holds the public token sequence and downstream target fixed, and measures the downstream target's negative-log-likelihood shift. On a 7B role-channel reasoning model used for validation, textual probes are unreliable: raw n-gram o...

AuthorsAlexander Boesgaard Lorup
Primary categorycs.LG
Published18 May 2026
Last updated at source18 May 2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ac6e12c3-9be8-4006-b5ad-2d3156eb3002" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.