Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Automated Grading of Handwritten Mathematics Using Vision-Capable LLMs

Automated grading systems have enabled scalable assessment for many response types, but handwritten mathematics remains a barrier due to the complexity of multi-step solutions. Vision-capable large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities here, yet their reliability in authentic instructional settings remains poorly understood. We present an empirical evaluation of an LLM-based grader for handwritten mathematical work using instructor-defined rubrics. Extending a prior pipeline for typed responses, we integrate transcription and rubric-based evaluation of photographic submissions within a single LLM call, evaluating on student work from two university STEM courses. Comparing AI grad...

AuthorsJacob Levine, Miguel Aenlle, Craig Zilles et al.
Primary categorycs.CY
Published18 May 2026
Last updated at source18 May 2026
cs.CYcs.AIcs.HC
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9e3c348e-e20d-4f19-b24c-6c37247c3892" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.