Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Evaluating Memory Condensation Strategies for Coding Agents in Data-Driven Scientific Discovery

Coding agents accumulate extensive context during long-running tasks, yet fixed context windows force practitioners to choose between truncation and task failure. While numerous memory condensation strategies have been proposed, from simple sliding windows to LLM-generated summaries, no systematic comparison exists to guide strategy selection, especially in scientific discovery tasks. We evaluate eight memory condensation strategies using GPT-4o on sixty DiscoveryBench tasks spanning six scientific domains (480 total evaluations). We find that no condenser significantly alters hypothesis quality, while LLM-based condensers increase token costs by 24-94 percent, and masking tool-call outpu...

AuthorsRenuka Chintalapati, Sid Raskar, Anurag Acharya et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published13 May 2026
Last updated at source13 May 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f9513b33-a247-4503-b464-453fbc0ab99a" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.