Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Rethinking Code Review in the Age of AI: A Vision for Agentic Code Review

Code review has evolved for decades, from informal peer checking to today's pull request (PR) workflows, yet it remains a largely manual and cognitively demanding process. The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) coding assistants has intensified this challenge: while these tools increase code production velocity, they also expand the volume of code requiring review, turning code review into a growing bottleneck. Current AI support in code review remains fragmented, with tools focusing on isolated tasks such as reviewer recommendation, PR description generation, or comment suggestion rather than the end-to-end PR review workflow. We address this gap by treating review effectiveness as an ...

AuthorsHüseyin Özgür Kamalı, Erdem Tuna, Vahid Haratian et al.
Primary categorycs.SE
Published17 May 2026
Last updated at source5 June 2026
cs.SEcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f7cf3d1e-3ce1-46a0-abd8-1475341d0355" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.