Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agents

The rapid deployment of LLM-based autonomous agents has introduced safety risks that extend far beyond traditional LLM concerns, prompting a proliferation of safety benchmarks since late 2023. However, these benchmarks have developed independently, with inconsistent threat models, incompatible metrics, and overlapping yet incomplete risk coverage. We present the first systematic analysis dedicated to agent safety benchmarks as evaluation instruments. We catalog 40 behavioral agent-safety benchmarks (2023-2026), plus 5 adjacent evaluator, defense, and dataset artifacts, propose a six-axis taxonomy of benchmark evaluation methodology, and apply it across the corpus to characterize how metho...

AuthorsMiles Q. Li, Benjamin C. M. Fung, Boyang Li et al.
Primary categorycs.CY
Published11 April 2026
Last updated at source11 April 2026
cs.CYcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ec73f2b3-267d-4f4b-af09-06f15c41eba1" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.