Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Is One Score Enough? Rethinking the Evaluation of Sequentially Evolving LLM Memory

Memory plays a central role in enabling large language models (LLMs) to operate over sequential tasks by accumulating and reusing experience over time. However, existing evaluations of LLM memory mostly rely on aggregate metrics such as final hold-out accuracy or cumulative online performance, which can obscure critical failure modes such as forgetting and negative transfer. In this paper, we introduce SeqMem-Eval, a diagnostic evaluation framework for sequentially evolving LLM memory. Drawing inspiration from continual learning, it targets a test-time setting in which memory is external, prompt-mediated, and updated without modifying model parameters. Rather than focusing only on final p...

AuthorsSongwei Dong, Zihan Chen, Chengshuai Shi et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published14 May 2026
Last updated at source14 May 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c31a58dc-8126-46f1-8104-1218a6dc8a90" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.