Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

On Hallucinations in Inverse Problems: Fundamental Limits and Provable Assessment Methods

Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed imaging inverse problems, from medical diagnostics to Earth observation. Yet deep neural networks can produce hallucinations, realistic-looking but incorrect details, undermining their reliability, especially when ground truth data is unavailable. We develop a theoretical framework showing that such hallucinations are not merely artifacts of particular models, but can arise from the ill-posed nature of the inverse problem itself. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for hallucinations, together with computable bounds on their magnitude that depend only on the forward model. Building on this theory, we introduce algorithms to: (1) estim...

AuthorsDavid Iagaru, Nina M. Gottschling, Anders C. Hansen et al.
Primary categorystat.ML
Published13 May 2026
Last updated at source13 May 2026
stat.MLcs.CVcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bac407e6-6d7a-433a-b952-dd23c8ce5130" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.