Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Rethinking LLMOps for Fraud and AML: Building a Compliance-Grade LLM Serving Stack

Fraud detection and anti-money-laundering (AML) compliance are high-value domains for large language models (LLMs), but their serving requirements differ sharply from generic chat workloads. Compliance prompts are often prefix-heavy, schema-constrained, and evidence-rich, combining reusable policy instructions, risk taxonomies, transaction or document context, and short structured outputs such as JSON labels or risk factors. These properties make prefix reuse, KV-cache efficiency, runtime tuning, model orchestration, and output validation first-order systems concerns. This paper introduces a workload-aware LLMOps stack for fraud and AML workloads using self-hosted open-weight models such ...

AuthorsPrathamesh Vasudeo Naik, Naresh Dintakurthi, Yue Wang
Primary categorycs.AI
Published11 May 2026
Last updated at source11 May 2026
cs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a74c6ebc-7bcb-4b17-aae7-c4b3ada8a258" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.