Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

When and How to Canonize: A Generalization Perspective

While invariant architectures are standard for processing symmetric data, there is growing interest in achieving invariance by applying group averaging or canonization to non-invariant backbones. However, the theoretical generalization properties of these alternative strategies remain poorly understood. We introduce a theoretical framework to analyze the generalization error of these methods by bounding their covering numbers. We establish a rigorous generalization hierarchy: the error bounds of canonized models are at best equal to the error bounds of structurally invariant and group-averaged models, and at worst equal to the bounds of non-invariant baselines. Furthermore, we show that t...

AuthorsYonatan Sverdlov, Benjamin Friedman, Snir Hordan et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published10 May 2026
Last updated at source11 October 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/da43702f-d765-4b77-b3fb-5f64a2fc755d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.