Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

ConfoundingSHAP: Quantifying confounding strength in causal inference

In causal inference, confounders are variables that influence both treatment decisions and outcomes. However, unlike as in randomized clinical trials, the treatment assignment mechanism in observational studies is not known, and it is thus unclear which covariates act as confounders. Here, we aim to generate insight for causal inference and answer: which of the observed covariates act as confounders? We introduce ConfoundingSHAP, a Shapley-based method for attributing confounding strength to individual covariates. Our contributions are twofold. First, we propose a Shapley game targeted to infer the confounding strength of the covariates. Our resulting Shapley values differ from the standa...

AuthorsMarie Brockschmidt, Santo M. A. R. Thies, Maresa Schröder et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published11 May 2026
Last updated at source11 May 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/78fa6b11-3690-4beb-8648-8fa93aecb5f5" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.