Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

LEVI: Stronger Search Architectures Can Substitute for Larger LLMs in Evolutionary Search

LLM-guided evolutionary methods such as AlphaEvolve have proven effective in domains like math, systems research, and algorithmic discovery, but their reliance on frontier models makes each run expensive. We argue this is largely an artifact of how existing frameworks allocate search: archives that fail to preserve solution diversity force compensation through stronger mutation models; blind model use spends frontier dollars on local edits a smaller model could handle; and full-set evaluation wastes rollouts on redundant examples. We introduce LEVI, a harness-first evolutionary framework built on the bet that stronger search architectures can substitute for or even outperform larger LLMs ...

AuthorsTemoor Tanveer
Primary categorycs.NE
Published10 May 2026
Last updated at source10 May 2026
cs.NEcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/afd464cd-3719-43f6-adfb-82c59733861a" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.