Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Results and Retrospective Analysis of the CODS 2025 AssetOpsBench Challenge

Competition retrospectives are useful when they explain what a leaderboard measured, how hidden evaluation changed conclusions, and which design patterns were rewarded. We revisit the CODS 2025 \assetopslive{} challenge, a privacy-aware Codabench competition on industrial multi-agent orchestration built on \assetops{}. We combine final rank sheets, a 300-submission server log, 149-team registrations, best-submission exports, the organizer winners report, the companion \assetopslive{} system paper, and verified planning-track source trees. Five results stand out. First, the public planning leaderboard saturates at 72.73\%, and richer prompts do not improve that peak. Second, hidden evaluat...

AuthorsDhaval Patel, Chathurangi Shyalika, Suryanarayana Reddy Yarrabothula et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published8 May 2026
Last updated at source8 May 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e68bb079-bd52-41e6-ac02-c7dc357008bb" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.