Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Flatness and Gradient Alignment Are Both Necessary: Spectral-Aware Gradient-Aligned Exploration for Multi-Distribution Learning

Sharpness-aware and gradient-alignment methods have been shown to improve generalization, however each family of methods targets a single geometric property of the loss landscape, while ignoring the other. In this paper, we show that this omission is structurally unavoidable and that both flatness and gradient alignment should be considered in multi-distribution learning settings. Specifically, we derive an excess-risk decomposition that yields two additive leading-order terms: (i) an alignment term, controlled by the trace of $\bar{H}^{-1}Σ_g$ and (ii) a curvature term, controlled by $\bar{H}$, where $\bar{H}$ is the average Hessian and $Σ_g$ is the covariance of the gradient across dist...

AuthorsAristotelis Ballas, Christos Diou
Primary categorycs.LG
Published8 May 2026
Last updated at source15 July 2026
cs.LGcs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/90dcdef2-dc0b-44a9-9b47-899f392367f6" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.