Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Is the Future Compatible? Diagnosing Dynamic Consistency in World Action Models

World Action Models (WAMs) enable decision-making through imagined rollouts by predicting future observations and actions. However, the reliability of these imagined futures remains under-examined: is a generated future merely visually plausible, or is it dynamically compatible with the action sequence it claims to model? In this work, we identify action-state consistency, the alignment between predicted actions and induced state transitions, as a missing reliability axis for WAMs. Through a systematic study across representative joint-prediction and inverse-dynamics models, we find that action-state consistency systematically separates successful and failed rollouts across many tasks and...

AuthorsBo-Kai Ruan, Teng-Fang Hsiao, Ling Lo et al.
Primary categorycs.RO
Published8 May 2026
Last updated at source8 May 2026
cs.ROcs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a13ea5a2-8dbf-40a4-bbd7-07e76bd2c52d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.