Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Cited but Not Verified: Parsing and Evaluating Source Attribution in LLM Deep Research Agents

Large language models (LLMs) power deep research agents that synthesize information from hundreds of web sources into cited reports, yet these citations cannot be reliably verified. Current approaches either trust models to self-cite accurately, risking bias, or employ retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) that does not validate source accessibility, relevance, or factual consistency. We introduce the first source attribution evaluation framework that uses a reproducible AST parser to extract and evaluate inline citations from LLM-generated Markdown reports at scale. Unlike methods that verify claims in isolation, our framework closes the loop by retrieving the actual cited content, enabli...

AuthorsHailey Onweller, Elias Lumer, Austin Huber et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published7 May 2026
Last updated at source7 May 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bae46e19-9daf-441b-9779-3492ee908e26" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.