Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

When Graph Language Models Go Beyond Memorization

It remains unclear whether graph language models learn structural regularities or merely memorize training graphs; this cannot be resolved by current aggregate fidelity metrics alone. We develop a calibrated diagnostic protocol that combines frequent subgraph mining, a graph-level bootstrap baseline, and three-level frequency stratification to disentangle memorization from structural alignment. Using this framework, we show that graph language models can acquire structural regularities beyond memorization at scale, primarily in the high-frequency regime. This is supported by the following empirical evidence: On five TU benchmarks, LLaMA-style graph language models reach high subgraph-rank...

AuthorsMasatsugu Yamada, Mahito Sugiyama
Primary categorycs.LG
Published7 May 2026
Last updated at source7 May 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ef25484c-1787-4c44-bbea-495d969fc5ce" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.