Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Towards Annotation-Free Validation of MLLMs: A Vision-Language Logical Consistency Metric

Dominant accuracy evaluation might reward unwarranted guessing of Large Language Models, and it might not be applicable to novel tasks for model validation without ground-truth (gt) annotation. Based on basic logic principle, we propose a novel framework to evaluate the vision-language logical consistency of MLLMs on both sufficient and necessary cause-effect relations. We define Vision-Language Logical Consistency Metric (VL-LCM) on traditional MC-VQA tests, and recent NaturalBench tests without the need for gt annotation. Through systematic experiments on representative VL benchmark MMMU and recent VL challenges like NaturalBench, we evaluated 11 recent open-source MLLMs from 4 frontier...

AuthorsYing Gu, Mei Chee Leong, Hui Li Tan et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published7 May 2026
Last updated at source7 May 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8745e4a8-fb85-414c-90c4-a43522ac11ce" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.