Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

A Testable Certificate for Constant Collapse in Teacher-Guided VAEs

Posterior collapse in variational autoencoders is often diagnosed by its symptoms: a small KL term, a strong decoder, or weak use of the latent code. These signals are useful, but they do not define a collapse boundary. We study a concrete failure mode, input-independent constant collapse, and show that this case admits an exact threshold. For any fixed nonconstant teacher distribution \(T(\cdot\mid x)\), the best constant student is the dataset-average teacher distribution, and its alignment cost is the teacher mutual information \(I_T(X;T)\). Therefore, if a strictly latent-only raw witness achieves alignment loss below this value, with a safety margin, the witness cannot be constant in...

AuthorsZegu Zhang, Jianhua Peng, Jian Zhang
Primary categorycs.LG
Published7 May 2026
Last updated at source7 May 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8edd0920-dc28-4f06-891e-66f92b19c267" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.