Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

The Predictive-Causal Gap: An Impossibility Theorem and Large-Scale Neural Evidence

We report a systematic failure mode in predictive representation learning. Across 2695 neural network configurations trained to predict linear-Gaussian dynamics, the optimal encoder tracks the environment rather than the system it is meant to model. The mean causal fidelity -- the fraction of encoder sensitivity allocated to system degrees of freedom -- is 0.49, and only 2.5% of configurations exceed 0.70. The failure intensifies with dimension: at N=100, the optimal encoder becomes causally blind (fidelity ~10^{-8}) while achieving 92% lower prediction error than the causal representation. We prove this is not an optimization artifact but a structural property of the predictive objective...

AuthorsKejun Liu
Primary categorycs.LG
Published6 May 2026
Last updated at source6 May 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d8f65fd5-af63-43a7-aa7f-98f1a1c96380" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.