Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Adaptivity Under Realizability Constraints: Comparing In-Context and Agentic Learning

We compare in-context learning with fixed queries and agentic learning with adaptive queries for uniform approximation of task families. We consider two settings: an unrestricted regime, where querying and approximation are arbitrary functions, and a realizable regime, where we require these operations to be implemented by ReLU neural networks. In both settings, adaptivity never hinders approximation performance. However, this advantage can change when one passes from the unrestricted regime to the realizable regime. We identify four distinct approximation scenarios, each witnessed by an explicit task family: (a) no advantage of adaptivity; (b) an advantage in the unrestricted regime that...

AuthorsAnastasis Kratsios, A. Martina Neuman, Philipp Petersen
Primary categorycs.LG
Published6 May 2026
Last updated at source6 May 2026
cs.LGmath.STstat.ML
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bdde4b44-edcd-426e-af19-7e5c4df77bfa" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.