Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Temporal Reasoning Is Not the Bottleneck: A Probabilistic Inconsistency Framework for Neuro-Symbolic QA

Despite significant advances, large language models (LLMs) continue to exhibit brittle performance on complex temporal reasoning tasks. This failure mode is widely attributed to inherent deficits in autoregressive logical deduction. In this paper, we challenge this prevailing narrative, demonstrating that temporal reasoning is not the fundamental bottleneck; rather, the locus of failure lies in unstructured text-to-event representation. We introduce a novel neuro-symbolic question-answering framework governed by a Probabilistic Inconsistency Signal (PIS) that explicitly isolates perceptual errors from reasoning failures. By lifting unstructured text into explicit event graphs and interval...

AuthorsTran Quang Liem
Primary categorycs.AI
Published5 May 2026
Last updated at source5 May 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a0263580-6efa-43d1-a36e-e587eafaa352" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.