Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Revisiting the Travel Planning Capabilities of Large Language Models

Travel planning serves as a critical task for long-horizon reasoning, exposing significant deficits in LLMs. However, existing benchmarks and evaluations primarily assess final plans in an end-to-end manner, which lacks interpretability and makes it difficult to analyze the root causes of failures. To bridge this gap, we decompose travel planning into five constituent atomic sub-capabilities, including \emph{Constraint Extraction}, \emph{Tool Use}, \emph{Plan Generation}, \emph{Error Identification}, and \emph{Error Correction}. We implement a decoupled evaluation protocol leveraging oracle intermediate contexts to rigorously isolate these components, thereby measuring the atomic performa...

AuthorsBo-Wen Zhang, Jin Ye, Peng-Yu Hua et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published5 May 2026
Last updated at source5 May 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f6ad9197-b9d0-4913-93ea-187299dc1eec" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.