Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Grounding Multi-Hop Reasoning in Structural Causal Models via Group Relative Policy Optimization

Multi-Hop Fact Verification requires complex reasoning across disparate evidence, posing significant challenges for Large Language Models , which may suffer from hallucinations and fractured logical chains. Existing methods, while improving transparency via Chain-of-Thought , often lack explicit modeling of the structural dependencies between evidence and claims. In this work, we introduce an SCM-inspired framework that grounds reasoning in explicit directed dependency graphs, treating verification as a constructive structural reasoning process rather than full causal inference with interventions or counterfactual semantics. We empirically identify an "inverted U-shaped" correlation betwe...

AuthorsYunhan Bu, Quan Zhang, Huaping Zhang et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published2 May 2026
Last updated at source23 June 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/af8c91e9-3bee-4c0e-aa1f-f5d5f3b5505d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.