Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Knowing when to trust machine-learned interatomic potentials

Prevailing machine-learned interatomic potential (MLIP) uncertainty-quantification methods rely on ensembles of independently trained backbones. These methods scale unfavorably with foundation-scale MLIPs, and their member-disagreement signals correlate weakly with per-molecule prediction error. Here we probe the frozen per-atom representations of a pretrained MLIP with a compact discriminative classifier, recasting MLIP uncertainty quantification as selective classification rather than error regression. The resulting method, PROBE (Post-hoc Reliability frOm Backbone Embeddings), produces a per-prediction reliability probability that monotonically tracks actual error without modification ...

AuthorsShams Mehdi, Ilkwon Cho, Olexandr Isayev
Primary categorycs.LG
Published1 May 2026
Last updated at source1 May 2026
cs.LGphysics.chem-ph
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a7809852-984d-4ebe-816c-6e9383097e44" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.