Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Putting HUMANS first: Efficient LAM Evaluation with Human Preference Alignment

The rapid proliferation of large audio models (LAMs) demands efficient approaches for model comparison, yet comprehensive benchmarks are costly. To fill this gap, we investigate whether minimal subsets can reliably evaluate LAMs while reducing costs and data redundancy. Analyzing 10 subset selection methods with 18 audio models across 40 tasks covering major LAM evaluation dimensions, we show that subsets of just 50 examples (0.3% of data) can achieve over 0.93 Pearson correlation with full benchmark scores. To understand how well these scores align with what practitioners ultimately care about, user satisfaction, we collect 776 human preference ratings from realistic voice assistant conv...

AuthorsWoody Haosheng Gan, William Held, Diyi Yang
Primary categorycs.CL
Published20 April 2026
Last updated at source13 September 2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.SD
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/aa560089-470b-436b-8f27-648f49c4ea62" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.