Optimization before Evaluation: Evaluation with Unoptimised Prompts Can be Misleading
Current Large Language Model (LLM) evaluation frameworks utilize the same static prompt template across all models under evaluation. This differs from the common industry practice of using prompt optimization (PO) techniques to optimize the prompt for each model to maximize application performance. In this paper, we investigate the effect of PO towards LLM evaluations. Our results on public academic and internal industry benchmarks show that PO greatly affects the final ranking of models. This highlights the importance of practitioners performing PO per model when conducting evaluations to choose the best model for a given task.
| Authors | Nicholas Sadjoli, Tim Siefken, Atin Ghosh et al. |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.AI |
| Published | 30 April 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 30 April 2026 |
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.