Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Regression Test Selection for Updated Capability Modules in Compositional ML Systems via Atomic-Quality Probes

Compositional machine-learning (ML) systems assemble runtime behavior from libraries of independently re-trained capability modules. Replacing one module raises a regression-testing question that static dependence analysis cannot answer: which existing compositions stay valid, and at what test cost? We frame capability updates as regression test selection (RTS) and contribute four results. First, a paired cross-version swap protocol isolates the marginal effect of a single module update. Second, on two contact-rich manipulation tasks we characterize a dominant-skill effect: one capability module reaches 88.0% atomic success while siblings stay at or below 32.0%, and its inclusion shifts c...

AuthorsXue Qin, Simin Luan, Cong Yang et al.
Primary categorycs.RO
Published29 April 2026
Last updated at source2 July 2026
cs.ROcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/cd49eb66-260e-4bec-904c-4ac2017c19c6" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.