Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

On Challenges in Evaluation Methodology: A Review

Recent advances in language models have prompted a growing body of work that questions prevailing evaluation practices. However, many such critiques have already been discussed in natural language processing (NLP), a field with a long history of methodological reflection on evaluation. We conduct a scoping review spanning four decades and develop a taxonomy of 22 recurring concerns. For each concern, we examine how recently it was discussed in the reviewed literature and whether it receives explicit attention in institutional checklists, finding that some concerns have become less visible in literature and many lack coverage in these checklists. Our work provides an overview of the major ...

AuthorsRuchira Dhar, Qiwei Peng, Anders Søgaard
Primary categorycs.CL
Published1 April 2026
Last updated at source14 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d87b3ad3-1a0a-4833-a90a-b5b02024aa14" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.