Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

The Surprising Effectiveness of Canonical Knowledge Distillation for Semantic Segmentation

Recent knowledge distillation (KD) methods for semantic segmentation introduce increasingly complex hand-crafted objectives, yet are typically evaluated under fixed iteration schedules. These objectives substantially increase per-iteration cost, meaning equal iteration counts do not correspond to equal training budgets. It is therefore unclear whether reported gains reflect stronger distillation signals or simply greater compute. We show that iteration-based comparisons are misleading: when wall-clock compute is matched, canonical logit- and feature-based KD outperform recent segmentation-specific methods. Under extended training, feature-based distillation achieves state-of-the-art ResNe...

AuthorsMuhammad Ali, Kevin Alexander Laube, Madan Ravi Ganesh et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published28 April 2026
Last updated at source29 April 2026
cs.CVcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7a6333cb-a514-466a-bd4c-3a0afc352574" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.