Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Generating Place-Based Compromises Between Two Points of View

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel academically but struggle with social intelligence tasks, such as creating good compromises. In this paper, we present methods for generating empathically neutral compromises between two opposing viewpoints. We first compared four different prompt engineering methods using Claude 3 Opus and a dataset of 2,400 contrasting views on shared places. A subset of the gen erated compromises was evaluated for acceptability in a 50-participant study. We found that the best method for generating compromises between two views used external empathic similarity between a compromise and each viewpoint as iterative feedback, outperforming stan dard Chain of Thought (CoT...

AuthorsSumanta Bhattacharyya, Francine Chen, Scott Carter et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published27 April 2026
Last updated at source27 April 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f199a2a1-8467-49d4-a29a-82b23f443758" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.