Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Jailbreaking Frontier Foundation Models Through Intention Deception

Large (vision-)language models exhibit remarkable capability but remain highly susceptible to jailbreaking. Existing safety training approaches aim to have the model learn a refusal boundary between safe and unsafe, based on the user's intent. It has been found that this binary training regime often leads to brittleness, since the user intent cannot reliably be evaluated, especially if the attacker obfuscates their intent, and also makes the system seem unhelpful. In response, frontier models, such as GPT-5, have shifted from refusal-based safeguards to safe completion, that aims to maximize helpfulness while obeying safety constraints. However, safe completion could be exploited when a u...

AuthorsXinhe Wang, Katia Sycara, Yaqi Xie
Primary categorycs.CR
Published27 April 2026
Last updated at source27 April 2026
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b5bd3181-6c63-4a08-b1f8-b41e0423b80d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.