Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

PeeriScope: A Multi-Faceted Framework for Evaluating Peer Review Quality

The increasing scale and variability of peer review in scholarly venues has created an urgent need for systematic, interpretable, and extensible tools to assess review quality. We present PeeriScope, a modular platform that integrates structured features, rubric-guided large language model assessments, and supervised prediction to evaluate peer review quality along multiple dimensions. Designed for openness and integration, PeeriScope provides both a public interface and a documented API, supporting practical deployment and research extensibility. The demonstration illustrates its use for reviewer self-assessment, editorial triage, and large-scale auditing, and it enables the continued de...

AuthorsSajad Ebrahimi, Soroush Sadeghian, Ali Ghorbanpour et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published27 April 2026
Last updated at source27 April 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9b9c0fa5-d914-46d8-a1dd-3604f52a5c8a" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.