Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Continual Calibration: Coverage Can Collapse Before Accuracy in Lifelong LLM Fine-Tuning

Continual learning for large language models is typically evaluated through accuracy retention under sequential fine-tuning. We argue that this perspective is incomplete, because uncertainty reliability can degrade earlier and more sharply than top-1 performance. We study this empirically by measuring conformal coverage and calibration error on sequentially fine-tuned models across three model families and eight task sequences drawn primarily from classification and multiple-choice benchmarks. Across the classification-style settings we study, coverage loss exceeds accuracy loss by a factor of roughly \(3.4\times \pm 0.5\times\) on average across seeds; in the most pronounced case, covera...

AuthorsIbne Farabi Shihab, Sanjeda Akter, Anuj Sharma
Primary categorycs.LG
Published27 April 2026
Last updated at source27 April 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f9c66332-fedb-4103-a559-5d6965f864c3" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.