Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Evaluation of Prompt Injection Defenses in Large Language Models

LLM-powered applications routinely embed secrets in system prompts, yet models can be tricked into revealing them. We built an adaptive attacker that evolves its strategies over hundreds of rounds and tested it against nine defense configurations across more than 20,000 attacks. Every defense that relied on the model to protect itself eventually broke. The only defense that held was output filtering, which checks the model's responses via hardcoded rules in separate application code before they reach the user, achieving zero leaks across 15,000 attacks. These results demonstrate that security boundaries must be enforced in application code, not by the model being attacked. Until such defe...

AuthorsPriyal Deep, Shane Emmons, Amy Fox et al.
Primary categorycs.CR
Published26 April 2026
Last updated at source12 May 2026
cs.CRcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8bd2247b-acbe-4110-b5c5-bab8f71c5a9c" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.