Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Do Protective Perturbations Really Protect Portrait Privacy under Real-world Image Transformations?

Proactive defense methods protect portrait images from unauthorized editing or talking face generation (TFG) by introducing pixel-level protective perturbations, and have attracted increasing attention for privacy protection. In real-world use, images inevitably undergo sequences of benign operations during display and dissemination, such as resizing and color compression, which directly alter pixel values. Existing studies and robustness defenses mainly examine individual transformations in isolation, while sequentially composed transformations remain underexplored. To address this gap, we systematically evaluate whether representative proactive defenses against unauthorized image editin...

AuthorsRuiqing Sun, Xingshan Yao, Zhijing Wu et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published26 April 2026
Last updated at source11 August 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8cba6fa5-7363-4917-8bc0-8f6312f30ab9" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.