Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

SLIDERS: Systematic Reviews via Automated Evidence Synthesis and Reconciliation

Systematic reviews -- which requires comprehensive evidence collection and synthesis from large document corpora in response to targeted research questions -- are foundational in finance, social sciences, and other technical fields. Manual construction of evidence tables is labor-intensive, and recent LLM-based assistants relying on embedding or keyword based search often fail to meet the coverage standards of systematic reviews. We introduce SLIDERS, a novel LLM-based methodology for systematic reviews, by automatically assembling evidence tables tailored to research questions. In addition to extracting structured data from documents, SLIDERS can extract full-text excerpts that serve as ...

AuthorsHarshit Joshi, Priyank Shethia, Jadelynn Dao et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published24 April 2026
Last updated at source9 July 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7cc7441c-e00e-4036-acaa-1f337595329e" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.