Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Addressing Image Authenticity When Cameras Use Generative AI

The ability of generative AI (GenAI) methods to photorealistically alter camera images has raised awareness about the authenticity of images shared online. Interestingly, images captured directly by our cameras are considered authentic and faithful. However, with the increasing integration of deep-learning modules into cameras' capture-time hardware -- namely, the image signal processor (ISP) -- there is now a potential for hallucinated content in images directly output by our cameras. Hallucinated capture-time image content is typically benign, such as enhanced edges or texture, but in certain operations, such as AI-based digital zoom or low-light image enhancement, hallucinations can po...

AuthorsUmar Masud, Abhijith Punnappurath, Luxi Zhao et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published23 April 2026
Last updated at source23 April 2026
cs.CVcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/96cb182d-1ac0-4552-beb4-2515c1e7d060" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.