Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Measuring Creativity in the Age of Generative AI: Distinguishing Human and AI-Generated Creative Performance in Hiring and Talent Systems

Generative AI is rapidly transforming how organizations create value and evaluate talent. While large language models enhance baseline output quality, they simultaneously introduce ambiguity in assessing human creativity, as observable artifacts may be partially or fully AI-generated. This paper reconceptualizes creativity as a distributional and process-based property that emerges under shared constraints and competitive incentives. We introduce a quantitative framework for measuring creativity as novelty in synthesis, operationalized through idea generation and idea transformation within embedding space. Empirical evaluation demonstrates that the proposed metrics align with intuitive ju...

AuthorsYigal Rosen, Ilia Rushkin
Primary categorycs.HC
Published10 April 2026
Last updated at source10 April 2026
cs.HCcs.AIcs.CYq-bio.NC
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7ab59d18-dd14-4c95-aa37-b11674dd7182" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.