Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment

Large Language Model agents have rapidly evolved from static text generators into dynamic systems capable of executing complex autonomous workflows. To enhance reliability, multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing. While such role-playing effectively leverages domain expert knowledge, we find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry (AOA). Specifically, an agent acting as an actor (during self-reflection) tends to attribute failures to external factors, whereas an observer (during mutual auditing) attributes the same errors to internal faults. We quantify this us...

AuthorsBobo Li, Rui Wu, Zibo Ji et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published21 April 2026
Last updated at source21 April 2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a78aa7ce-e6b3-422b-a4bb-d58cb222b3ab" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.