Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Personalized Benchmarking: Evaluating LLMs by Individual Preferences

With the rise in capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and their deployment in real-world tasks, evaluating LLM alignment with human preferences has become an important challenge. Current benchmarks average preferences across all users to compute aggregate ratings, overlooking individual user preferences when establishing model rankings. Since users have varying preferences in different contexts, we call for personalized LLM benchmarks that rank models according to individual needs. We compute personalized model rankings using ELO ratings and Bradley-Terry coefficients for 115 active Chatbot Arena users and analyze how user query characteristics (topics and writing style) relate to...

AuthorsCristina Garbacea, Heran Wang, Chenhao Tan
Primary categorycs.AI
Published21 April 2026
Last updated at source21 April 2026
cs.AIcs.CLcs.HCcs.IRcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bbf73a6b-3dab-4a84-88ad-a165e178b908" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.