Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Adversarial Humanities Benchmark: Results on Stylistic Robustness in Frontier Model Safety

The Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) evaluates whether model safety refusals survive a shift away from familiar harmful prompt forms. Starting from harmful tasks drawn from MLCommons AILuminate, the benchmark rewrites the same objectives through humanities-style transformations while preserving intent. This extends literature on Adversarial Poetry and Adversarial Tales from single jailbreak operators to a broader benchmark family of stylistic obfuscation and goal concealment. In the benchmark results reported here, the original attacks record 3.84% attack success rate (ASR), while transformed methods range from 36.8% to 65.0%, yielding 55.75% overall ASR across 31 frontier models. U...

AuthorsMarcello Galisai, Susanna Cifani, Francesco Giarrusso et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published20 April 2026
Last updated at source20 April 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/41cf6ba0-3aa5-4318-ab08-fe504a7be2d7" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Connected in the knowledge graph

Explore this entry in the graph

Models and datasets referencing this paper

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.