Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Instinct vs. Reflection: Unifying Token and Verbalized Confidence in Multimodal Large Models

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in various perception and reasoning tasks. Despite this success, ensuring their reliability in practical deployment necessitates robust confidence estimation. Prior works have predominantly focused on text-only LLMs, often relying on computationally expensive self-consistency sampling. In this paper, we extend this to multimodal settings and conduct a comprehensive evaluation of MLLMs' response confidence estimation. Our analysis reveals a significant instinct-reflection misalignment: the model's implicit token-level support frequently diverges from its verbal self-assessment confidence. To address this mi...

AuthorsYunkai Dang, Yifan Jiang, Yizhu Jiang et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published19 April 2026
Last updated at source19 April 2026
cs.CVcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e439b765-b458-4e29-9635-32a4480c08f9" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.