Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Abstain-R1: Calibrated Abstention and Post-Refusal Clarification via Verifiable RL

Reinforcement fine-tuning improves the reasoning ability of large language models, but it can also encourage them to answer unanswerable queries by guessing or hallucinating missing information. Existing abstention methods either train models to produce generic refusals or encourage follow-up clarifications without verifying whether those clarifications identify the key missing information. We study queries that are clear in meaning but cannot be reliably resolved from the given information, and argue that a reliable model should not only abstain, but also explain what is missing. We propose a clarification-aware RLVR reward that, while rewarding correct answers on answerable queries, joi...

AuthorsSkylar Zhai, Jingcheng Liang, Dongyeop Kang
Primary categorycs.CL
Published18 April 2026
Last updated at source18 April 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9ab92034-8bff-4647-ac6b-98433bacd788" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.