Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Mapping Election Toxicity on Social Media across Issue, Ideology, and Psychosocial Dimensions

Online political hostility is pervasive, yet it remains unclear how toxicity varies across campaign issues and political ideology, and what psychosocial signals and framing accompany toxic expression online. In this work, we present a large-scale analysis of discourse on X (Twitter) during the five weeks surrounding the 2024 U.S. presidential election. We categorize posts into 10 major campaign issues, estimate the ideology of posts using a human-in-the-loop LLM-assisted annotation process, detect harmful content with an LLM-based toxicity detection model, and then examine the psychological drivers of toxic content. We use these annotated data to examine how harmful content varies across ...

AuthorsLei Cao, Wen Zeng, Xinyue Wu et al.
Primary categorycs.SI
Published18 April 2026
Last updated at source18 April 2026
cs.SIcs.CLcs.CY
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a2f19a7b-be48-42d2-a771-abff65888b43" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.