Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Medical thinking with multiple images

Large language models perform well on many medical QA benchmarks, but real clinical reasoning often requires integrating evidence across multiple images rather than interpreting a single view. We introduce MedThinkVQA, an expert-annotated benchmark for thinking with multiple images, where models must interpret each image, combine cross-view evidence, and answer diagnostic questions with intermediate supervision and step-level evaluation. The dataset contains 8,067 cases, including 720 test cases, with an average of 6.62 images per case, substantially denser than prior work, whose expert-level benchmarks use at most 1.43 images per case. On the test set, the best closed-source models, Clau...

AuthorsZonghai Yao, Benlu Wang, Yifan Zhang et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published14 April 2026
Last updated at source4 May 2026
cs.CVcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f9fca0fc-fdcb-4045-9621-6f896ddd7d4b" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.