Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Applied Explainability for Large Language Models: A Comparative Study

Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance across many natural language processing tasks, yet their decision processes remain difficult to interpret. This lack of transparency creates challenges for trust, debugging, and deployment in real-world systems. This paper presents an applied comparative study of three explainability techniques: Integrated Gradients, Attention Rollout, and SHAP, on a fine-tuned DistilBERT model for SST-2 sentiment classification. Rather than proposing new methods, the focus is on evaluating the practical behavior of existing approaches under a consistent and reproducible setup. The results show that gradient-based attribution provides more stable and...

AuthorsVenkata Abhinandan Kancharla
Primary categorycs.CL
Published15 April 2026
Last updated at source15 April 2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7b6572e9-8507-444b-979d-d7dfe379e1e0" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.