Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

The Autocorrelation Blind Spot: Why 42% of Turn-Level Findings in LLM Conversation Analysis May Be Spurious

Turn-level metrics are widely used to evaluate properties of multi-turn human-LLM conversations, from safety and sycophancy to dialogue quality. However, consecutive turns within a conversation are not statistically independent -- a fact that virtually all current evaluation pipelines fail to correct for in their statistical inference. We systematically characterize the autocorrelation structure of 66 turn-level metrics across 202 multi-turn conversations (11,639 turn pairs, 5 German-speaking users, 4 LLM platforms) and demonstrate that naive pooled analysis produces severely inflated significance estimates: 42% of associations that appear significant under standard pooled testing fail to...

AuthorsFerdinand M. Schessl
Primary categorycs.CL
Published15 April 2026
Last updated at source15 April 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f807f0ed-4d66-4ded-a2bb-a8575a8cf349" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.