Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

A Comparative Study of Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learning in Finite Horizon Dynamic Pricing

This paper provides a systematic comparison between Fitted Dynamic Programming (DP), where demand is estimated from data, and Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods in finite-horizon dynamic pricing problems. We analyze their performance across environments of increasing structural complexity, ranging from a single typology benchmark to multi-typology settings with heterogeneous demand and inter-temporal revenue constraints. Unlike simplified comparisons that restrict DP to low-dimensional settings, we apply dynamic programming in richer, multi-dimensional environments with multiple product types and constraints. We evaluate revenue performance, stability, constraint satisfaction behavior, a...

AuthorsLev Razumovskiy, Nikolay Karenin
Primary categoryecon.GN
Published15 April 2026
Last updated at source15 April 2026
econ.GNcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8e0a6038-9d51-479f-85cd-ed65e47f1154" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.