Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Counterfactual Peptide Editing for Causal TCR--pMHC Binding Inference

Neural models for TCR-pMHC binding prediction are susceptible to shortcut learning: they exploit spurious correlations in training data -- such as peptide length bias or V-gene co-occurrence -- rather than the physical binding interface. This renders predictions brittle under family-held-out and distance-aware evaluation, where such shortcuts do not transfer. We introduce \emph{Counterfactual Invariant Prediction} (CIP), a training framework that generates biologically constrained counterfactual peptide edits and enforces invariance to edits at non-anchor positions while amplifying sensitivity at MHC anchor residues. CIP augments the base classifier with two auxiliary objectives: (1) an i...

AuthorsSanjar Khudoyberdiev, Arman Bekov
Primary categorycs.LG
Published14 April 2026
Last updated at source14 April 2026
cs.LGcs.GR
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c735d424-a8b6-4879-9709-479538dd549f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.