Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Can AI Tools Transform Low-Demand Math Tasks? An Evaluation of Task Modification Capabilities

While recent research has explored AI tools' ability to classify the quality of mathematical tasks (arXiv:2603.03512), little is known about their capacity to increase the quality of existing tasks. This study investigated whether AI tools could successfully upgrade low-cognitive-demand mathematics tasks. Eleven tools were tested, including six broadly available, general-purpose AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT and Claude) and five tools specialized for mathematics teachers (e.g., Khanmigo, coteach.ai). Using the Task Analysis Guide framework (Stein & Smith, 1998), we prompted AI tools to modify two different types of low-demand mathematical tasks. The prompting strategy aimed to represent likely ...

AuthorsDanielle S. Fox, Brenda L. Robles, Elizabeth DiPietro Brovey et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published14 April 2026
Last updated at source14 April 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/77c8678a-654f-4e99-808a-0343c82fcda3" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.